<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expect Java Use to Grow in Web 2.0 Projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattf.com/wp/2008/04/03/expect-java-use-to-growth-in-web-20-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattf.com/wp/2008/04/03/expect-java-use-to-growth-in-web-20-projects/</link>
	<description>{It's Safer to be Risky}</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://wattf.com/wp/2008/04/03/expect-java-use-to-growth-in-web-20-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattf.com/wp/2008/04/03/expect-java-use-to-growth-in-web-20-projects/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Hrm. Not sure I agree with you as to why Java or C# stuff isn&#039;t &#039;popular.&#039; Yes it&#039;s mainly corporate but not because ISP&#039;s won&#039;t advertise you can use it. I think it the large IT governance infrastructure that is built around Java and C# that makes it friendly to corporations. PHP has some of that with Zend products (Yahoo likes its PHP) and Ruby has tools too... but nothing those that live in a corporate bureaucracy understand. 

The limitation in PHP and Ruby (and others) development is how people use them vs java and C#. The &#039;scripting&#039; languages build monolithic applications that do it all in a mess of uncompilable code while Java and C# folks learned some time ago that building a cluster of services or objects feeding a larger application saves you tears. Compiling it in parts. If anything SOA will become more common place and multi-lingual apps as XML layer does not care.

I like your baby duck analogy though... so true ;) You need a bigger reply box too... If this makes sense I will be shocked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm. Not sure I agree with you as to why Java or C# stuff isn&#8217;t &#8216;popular.&#8217; Yes it&#8217;s mainly corporate but not because ISP&#8217;s won&#8217;t advertise you can use it. I think it the large IT governance infrastructure that is built around Java and C# that makes it friendly to corporations. PHP has some of that with Zend products (Yahoo likes its PHP) and Ruby has tools too&#8230; but nothing those that live in a corporate bureaucracy understand. </p>
<p>The limitation in PHP and Ruby (and others) development is how people use them vs java and C#. The &#8217;scripting&#8217; languages build monolithic applications that do it all in a mess of uncompilable code while Java and C# folks learned some time ago that building a cluster of services or objects feeding a larger application saves you tears. Compiling it in parts. If anything SOA will become more common place and multi-lingual apps as XML layer does not care.</p>
<p>I like your baby duck analogy though&#8230; so true <img src='http://wattf.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  You need a bigger reply box too&#8230; If this makes sense I will be shocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://wattf.com/wp/2008/04/03/expect-java-use-to-growth-in-web-20-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattf.com/wp/2008/04/03/expect-java-use-to-growth-in-web-20-projects/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Agreed, but maybe I&#039;m biased? My path to Web 2.0 follows the arc you&#039;ve laid out. On your multi-lingual comment: I recently went rant-crazy because a developer refused to consider projects outside a particular stack. Man, that rubs me the wrong way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, but maybe I&#8217;m biased? My path to Web 2.0 follows the arc you&#8217;ve laid out. On your multi-lingual comment: I recently went rant-crazy because a developer refused to consider projects outside a particular stack. Man, that rubs me the wrong way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

