<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Section 116 Dies, Canada Celebrates&#8230;Sort of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattf.com/wp/2010/03/08/section-116-dies-canada-celebratessort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattf.com/wp/2010/03/08/section-116-dies-canada-celebratessort-of/</link>
	<description>{It's Safer to be Risky}</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Murphy</title>
		<link>http://wattf.com/wp/2010/03/08/section-116-dies-canada-celebratessort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 12:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattf.com/wp/2010/03/08/section-116-dies-canada-celebratessort-of/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>The lawyer&#039;s I&#039;ve spoken to recently have told me repeatedly that section 116 was never a definitive reason to do or not do a deal in Canada, but that it was emblematic of the climate for government vs. true free enterprise(especially disruptive ones) that is  the real issue.  

This sounds even more depressing than I originally thought but it is indeed one step int he right direction.  At this point I&#039;ll take it. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawyer&#8217;s I&#8217;ve spoken to recently have told me repeatedly that section 116 was never a definitive reason to do or not do a deal in Canada, but that it was emblematic of the climate for government vs. true free enterprise(especially disruptive ones) that is  the real issue.  </p>
<p>This sounds even more depressing than I originally thought but it is indeed one step int he right direction.  At this point I&#8217;ll take it. <img src='http://wattf.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver Jay</title>
		<link>http://wattf.com/wp/2010/03/08/section-116-dies-canada-celebratessort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancouver Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattf.com/wp/2010/03/08/section-116-dies-canada-celebratessort-of/#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Looks as though our government has seen the light at last. Although it&#039;s quite sad, that it took them so long to realize this rule is pretty ineffective and remove it. I hope foreign investors won&#039;t be avoiding our market any longer.

I&#039;ve also read an interview with Stephen Horwitz, where he discussed these good news, I hope he was right to presume that foreign VCs will take a second look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks as though our government has seen the light at last. Although it&#8217;s quite sad, that it took them so long to realize this rule is pretty ineffective and remove it. I hope foreign investors won&#8217;t be avoiding our market any longer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also read an interview with Stephen Horwitz, where he discussed these good news, I hope he was right to presume that foreign VCs will take a second look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

